The pricing conundrum: Personalized vs. Non-Personalized

In the age of data-driven decision-making, pricing remains one of the most critical yet complex elements for businesses.

In the age of data-driven decision-making, pricing remains one of the most critical yet complex elements for businesses. While personalized pricing, tailored to individual consumer preferences, has gained traction, it's not always feasible or ethical. So, how can companies optimize their pricing strategies without diving into the deep end of personalization? A recent academic study by Gerardo Berbeglia from the Melbourne Business School and Guillermo Gallego from The Chinese University of Hong Kong offers some intriguing insights that could revolutionize your pricing game.

Personalized pricing is the Holy Grail for many businesses. With the advent of big data and analytics, companies can now segment their customer base into micro-categories and offer prices that maximize profits. However, this approach has its challenges. It's not just about the technical complexity; there's also the ethical dimension. How fair is it to charge different prices for the same product based on a customer's willingness to pay?

On the flip side, non-personalized pricing, where everyone pays the same price, is easier to implement but often leaves money on the table. The study delves into this conundrum and offers a middle path that combines the best of both worlds.

The Magic of "Positive Direction Vectors"

The researchers introduce the concept of "positive direction vectors" in pricing. Imagine you have multiple products, and you're trying to figure out the best price for each. Instead of personalizing prices, you can use these vectors to find a general pricing direction that works well across your customer base. The study identifies two types of vectors: the "economic" and the "robust" directions.

• Economic Direction: This is a weighted average of what would be the optimal personalized prices. It aims to perform well on average across all customer types.
• Robust Direction: This direction offers the best worst-case performance. In other words, even if things go south, following the robust direction ensures that the losses are minimized.

Performance Guarantees

One of the most exciting aspects of the study is that it provides performance guarantees for these pricing strategies. It means that businesses can have a certain level of confidence that following these strategies will yield results that are close to what could be achieved with optimal personalized pricing.

Bundle Pricing and Clustering

The study also delves into bundle pricing, a strategy where multiple products are sold together at a discounted rate. It provides performance guarantees for simple bundle pricing policies relative to the optimal personalized bundling pricing strategy. Interestingly, the study also found that performance often improves when consumer types are clustered and each cluster is offered a price direction. Among clustering methods, k-means clustering outperformed others, suggesting that businesses could benefit from implementing k-means clustering in their pricing strategies.

Practical Implications

So, what does this all mean for your business?

1. Simplicity and Effectiveness: You don't have to go all-in on personalized pricing to maximize profits. Simple pricing strategies can be almost as effective if they align with these properly defined direction vectors.
2. Risk Mitigation: The robust direction vector acts as a safety net, offering a level of risk mitigation that is often missing in other pricing strategies.
3. Data-Driven: While the approach is less complex than full-blown personalized pricing, it's still rooted in data analytics. It allows for a more nuanced understanding of customer behavior without the ethical dilemmas associated with personalized pricing.
4. Flexibility: The approach is versatile and can be applied to various pricing problems, including bundle pricing and even non-linear pricing models.
5. Competitive Edge: In a market where everyone is either guessing prices or spending a fortune on personalized pricing algorithms, this could be your secret weapon for a more balanced, ethical, and profitable pricing strategy.

In conclusion, the study offers a fresh perspective on the age-old problem of pricing. It provides a mathematical foundation for strategies that are not only effective but also ethical and easy to implement. In a business landscape where every penny counts, these insights could be the difference between thriving and merely surviving.

So, the next time you're grappling with pricing decisions, remember that you don't have to choose between complexity and fairness. There's a middle path, and it's backed by science.

To read the full research paper, visit Bounds and Heuristics for Multi-Product Pricing.

For more analytics information and research, visit our Centre for Business Analytics page.

To find out more about studying at Melbourne Business School, visit our Degree Programs and Short Courses pages, or learn about our range of services For Organisations.